For B2B SaaS CTOs with an enterprise deal stuck in security review.
Already paying for Vanta or Drata
Enterprise-Ready
in 14 Days.
Implemented in your infrastructure, not written in a PDF.
You are still staring at a wall of failing checks.14 business days, or we credit you $1,000 a day.
90 seconds · 3 questions decide it · we call within 5 minutes
The engineer on your call is the one merging your PRs
Fixed price, published
$33,000
One fee. No hourly. No surprise invoice.
- Audit-ready14 business days
- Type 2 clock startsWeek 3
- Report in the data room~Week 5
- Your engineers’ time~3 hours
The full Enterprise-Ready Everything program is $115,000. The Sprint is the $33,000 core of it.
The first five builds are $16,500, because we publish the case study. 5 of 5 still open.
- The auditPerformed by an independent, AICPA-peer-reviewed CPA firm. Never by us.
- The platformWe work inside the Vanta or Drata seat you already pay for.
- The ownershipYou keep the seat, the evidence, the repo, and the auditor relationship.
How this starts.
Four steps. No contract before the readout.
- 01
Apply
About ninety seconds. Three questions decide whether this works for you.
- 02
We call
Within five minutes of your application, or at a time you pick instead.
- 03
The Deal-Blocker Teardown
$2,500, and it credits 100% against the Sprint. We map what is actually blocking your report against what an auditor will flag.
- 04
The readout
Your real dates, your gap list, and the decision. You leave with all three whether or not you work with us.
The situation
You already bought the platform. You still don’t have a report.
That’s not your fault. It’s the shape of the entire market.
At 0 employees the platform just shows you a wall of failing checks, and the real work is configuring the controls and producing the evidence behind them.
r/soc2
A platform can show 94 percent passing controls while the audit produces 15 findings, because the platform is measuring configuration and the auditor is measuring operation.
Our auditor piled roughly 40 hours worth of evidence collection work on my team.
Here’s the version you’re living.
A line in section three of a security questionnaire asks for your most recent SOC 2 report. Behind that line is a deal worth more than everything you’ll spend getting compliant. You bought Vanta or Drata for $10–28k, the dashboard is red, and you were quoted $16,000 by a platform rep and $80–100,000 by a consulting firm with no way to tell which number is the lie.
Meanwhile you have two senior engineers, no security hire, and a roadmap with no compliance quarter in it. And since March there is a new question on every call: after what happened to that fast-compliance vendor, how does anyone know this is real?
The mechanism
The gap nobody fills.
Three layers in this market. Two of them are fine.
The platform
Vanta, Drata
tells you what’s broken. It is a scoreboard, not a builder. It cannot log into your AWS account and fix your IAM policies.
The auditor
an independent CPA firm
tells you whether it’s real. Legally they cannot implement anything for you. If they did, they couldn’t audit you.
The middle layer
the one that actually implements
is where every complaint above comes from. Consultancies staff it with policy people who hand you a remediation list. Cheap bundlers staff it with templates. Speed platforms staffed it with, as it turned out, 493 identical reports.
We staff it with senior engineers who write the code.
The four pillars
- 01
The Merged-PR Control Build
We don’t hand you a list, we ship the fixes. Terraform and IAM hardening, centralized logging, CI/CD branch protection, MDM enrollment, automated on and offboarding, every required control implemented in your actual infrastructure and delivered as merged pull requests with written acceptance criteria. Your commit history becomes native audit evidence.
- 02
Real-Stack Evidence, Not Templates
Your policies are drafted from your live repo and infrastructure, then reviewed line by line by the senior on your account. In week two we wire continuous evidence collection, so your Type 2 observation window starts in week three. Every artifact traces back to a real commit or infrastructure change, so when your buyer’s security team checks, it holds.
- 03
The Auditor Shield
We book an AICPA-peer-reviewed CPA firm at kickoff, with fieldwork dates reserved before we write a line of code. No auditor queue eaten silently at the end. We sit in every auditor call and own the evidence-request list with a 24-hour answer SLA, so nobody dumps 40 hours of collection work on your team in week four.
- 04
The Deal Bridge, and You Own Everything
In week one you get a dated compliance-commitment letter and control-status attestation to hand your blocked buyer, so procurement holds the deal open while the report finishes. Your platform seat, your evidence exports, your repo, your auditor relationship. We’re removable any month. No hostages.
The timeline
About three hours of your time. Not three months.
- Day 020 min
SOW signed, access granted, auditor fieldwork dates locked
- Day 2–30
Deal-Bridge letter sent to your enterprise buyer
- Day 1–1430 min/wk
Controls implemented as merged PRs, platform false positives dispositioned, policies drafted from your stack
- Day 1445 min
Audit-ready gate. Controls merged, evidence flowing, dashboard green. You read the full readiness report
- Week 30
Continuous evidence live. Type 2 observation clock starts
- Week 3–50
Auditor fieldwork on the reserved dates. We answer every request
- ~Week 50
Clean SOC 2 Type 1 report in your data room, signed by the CPA firm
Total client time: about three hours.
Honest note on physics
The Type 2 observation window is three months minimum and nobody can compress it. Anyone selling you a SOC 2 report “in days” is selling you the thing that just blew up an entire company. What we compress is the implementation, and we start your Type 2 clock in week three instead of month six.
90 seconds · 3 questions decide it · we call within 5 minutes
The offer
Enterprise-Ready in 14 Days: The SOC 2 Sprint
Seven components
01The Merged-PR Control Build
$45,000every required control implemented in your infrastructure, delivered as merged pull requests with acceptance criteria
02The Real-Stack Policy Library
$12,000full policy set drafted from your live repo and infra, senior-reviewed, pre-tested against real enterprise security questionnaires
03Red-to-Green Platform Rescue
$9,500complete Vanta or Drata configuration: integrations wired, false positives dispositioned, owners assigned, access reviews that actually run
04The Auditor Shield
$8,500peer-reviewed CPA firm booked at kickoff, fieldwork dates reserved, we attend every call and answer every evidence request within 24 hours
05Type 2 Evidence Autopilot
$15,000continuous evidence collection wired in week 2, so your observation window starts week 3 and every control is provably operating
06The Anti-Hostage Clause
$5,000you own the platform seat (with a negotiated partner discount and renewal cap), the evidence exports, the repo, and the auditor relationship
07The Deal-Bridge Letter
$4,000week-one dated compliance-commitment letter and control-status attestation for your blocked buyer
Three bonuses, included
01The 200-Answer Questionnaire Vault
$9,500200+ real enterprise security-questionnaire items pre-answered from your implemented controls. Your next questionnaire takes hours, not weeks
02The Prove-It’s-Real Pack
$6,500evidence-to-commit map, auditor peer-review credentials, control-attestation one-pager for your data room, and trust-page copy
03Platform Bill Negotiation
$5,000we negotiate your Vanta or Drata renewal: partner discount pass-through plus a renewal-cap clause, in writing. Typically saves $3–8k a year
Total value $120,000
The price
$33,000
Fixed. Published. 50% at kickoff, 50% at the 14-day gate.
The first five builds are $16,500.
Here’s why, plainly. This is a new firm doing an old job properly, and what we need most is a public record of the work. So the first five builds go out at half the published price, the complete Sprint with the same guarantees and the same named engineers, and in exchange we publish your case study: the blocked deal, the dates, the PRs merged, the opinion. If the outcome isn’t good there’s no case study, and you keep the work anyway.
5 of 5 founding builds left
The $2,500 Deal-Blocker Teardown you start with credits 100% against this. Written acceptance criteria mean no invoice ever grows without your signature.
90 seconds · 3 questions decide it · we call within 5 minutes
What $16,500 actually is: roughly one to two weeks of one senior engineer’s fully loaded cost. The alternative is 100 to 400 hours of your own engineers’ time, three months of your own attention, and a deal that sits in procurement the entire time.
Why there is a gate
Auditor calendars book four to eight weeks out.
We reserve your fieldwork dates at kickoff, which is why the report lands around week five instead of whenever a queue clears.
We take 3 builds a month.
That is what two to three senior engineers can implement without handing your work to someone you never met.
The guarantee
Two guarantees, in writing.
- 01
The 14-Day Speed Guarantee
Audit-ready in 14 business days from access, with controls implemented, evidence flowing and the readiness gate green, or we credit $1,000 per business day of delay against your final payment.
- 02
The Walk-Away Guarantee
Read the full readiness report at the 14-day gate. Not satisfied? Walk away, keep the policy library and every merged pull request, and you owe nothing beyond the kickoff payment.
Conditions
Because a guarantee with no conditions is marketing and a guarantee with conditions is a contract: read-only and PR access granted within 48 hours of kickoff, one 30-minute weekly call attended, the audit performed by a peer-reviewed CPA firm, and no material scope change mid-engagement without a re-baseline.
What we will never guarantee
The auditor’s opinion is theirs, independently formed, and that independence is the entire point of a SOC 2. What we guarantee is our work and our remediation of anything they find. That distinction is exactly the line the companies you read about in the news erased.
90 seconds · 3 questions decide it · we call within 5 minutes
Proof
No case studies yet. Here’s what we have instead.
Everything below is checkable before you pay us anything.
- 01
Who did this before
Our team took a venture-backed software startup through this exact program end to end, after a cheap vendor’s templates failed the walkthrough. No security officer, fifteen-year-old policy templates with the names swapped, and a Type 2 observation window that had to actually survive. That is the reason this offer exists in this exact shape, down to the merged PRs.
- 02
The firm that signs your report
An independent CPA firm in AICPA peer review, never us. We do not perform audits and we are not a CPA firm, and any vendor who blurs that line is selling you the thing that just collapsed. You pick the firm from our shortlist or bring your own. Either way the relationship is yours.
- 03
How to check anyone, including us
Four questions. Who merges the pull requests? Can I see an evidence-to-commit map from a finished build? Which firm signs, and are they in peer review? And what happens if the auditor doesn’t issue a clean opinion? Point those at every vendor you are evaluating this year. We’d rather you asked them than didn’t.
- 04
Why there is a gap in the market right now
A leaked set of 494 reports from one fast-compliance vendor contained 493 identical documents. Same conclusions, same typos, some written before the evidence existed. That company is gone and the AICPA now flags identical reports as nonconforming. The buyers who trusted the fast option hold paper they cannot defend, and the slow option still takes eight to twelve weeks and hands you a PDF.
Never a fake logo. Never a stock testimonial. Never a case study without written permission.
FAQ
The objections, answered before the call.
Why is there an application instead of a calendar link?
Because this only works for a specific situation: you’re paying for a compliance platform, you have an enterprise deal actually blocked, and you don’t have a security hire. If all three aren’t true we’ll tell you within the hour and you’ll have saved forty-five minutes. If they are true, you’ll have a call booked in about ninety seconds and I’ll call you before you’ve closed the tab.
After what happened in March, how do I know you’re not the same thing?
You should ask that. The fact that you’re asking means you’ll survive your buyer’s diligence too. Three checkable differences.
First, we don’t produce reports. An independent, AICPA-peer-reviewed CPA firm does, and we’ll name the firm and hand you its peer-review record before you pay us anything. You can also bring your own peer-reviewed firm and we’ll work with them.
Second, every artifact we produce traces to a commit or an infrastructure change in your repo, so there is nothing to fabricate.
Third, our contract carries remediation obligations we will read to you line by line on the call. We do not advertise outcome guarantees we have not delivered yet, because advertising one you have never actually honoured is precisely what this market just learned to punish.
$33,000 is a lot. Others do it for $12,000.
That band is real, and it’s the band the industry itself calls “a certificate, not a program.” At $12k somebody is either handing you a remediation list your engineers have to execute, or templating your policies, or both.
Compare on two questions instead of price: who merges the pull requests, and what happens if the auditor doesn’t issue a clean opinion? Those two questions are the whole market.
We already pay Vanta $15k a year. Isn’t this double-paying?
The platform is a scoreboard. It tells you the score, it can’t score points. This is not a second layer, it’s a replacement for 100 to 400 hours of your own engineering time. We also negotiate your platform renewal, partner discount plus a renewal cap, which usually pays for a chunk of this.
Can’t my engineers just do it?
Genuinely, yes. It’s 100 to 400 hours of senior engineering time across seven workstreams, and the dependency order matters more than the task list. If your team has that this quarter, do it yourself and keep the money. Most CTOs who look honestly at the hour count against their roadmap decide the deal is worth more than the pride.
How can you be that much faster than everyone else?
Because the fourteen days are implementation days, and implementation is engineering work done by senior engineers with a library of pre-built, pre-tested control modules. Not a discovery phase, not a policy-writing phase, not a junior consultant learning your stack.
What we do not compress is the parts governed by physics. Auditor fieldwork takes weeks and a Type 2 observation window is three months minimum. That’s why the report lands around week five and not “in days.”
The deal isn’t waiting on your engineers. It’s waiting on fourteen days.
90 seconds · 3 questions decide it · we call within 5 minutes
5 of 5 founding builds left at $16,500. 3 builds a month.
The application takes about ninety seconds. If you’re a fit you’ll pick a time on my calendar on the next screen, and I’ll call you before you’ve closed the tab. On that call we map what is actually blocking the report, what’s real on your dashboard versus what an auditor will flag, and you leave with real dates whether or not you work with us.